The level of comfort and sound isolation is fantastic. They can reveal hiss and hum of devices you thought have a crystal clear background. The FiiO FH5 in-ears have a great, flat frequency response which means basically all of the notes wil be given equal emphasis when you listen to your music. FiiO FA7 vs FiiO FH5-Starting with one that's pretty obvious, let's talk a bit about FH5 vs FA7. But at the end of the day, both IEMs have great ergonomics and are easily wearable for long listening sessions. The FH5 comes packaged similarly to other Fiio products, however, its all black colour scheme exudes a markedly more premium aura. The low frequencies of the Shure SE425 are modest, without any emphasis at all. What's the difference between the FH7 and the FH5? The FH7 sports a copper-plated silver Litz cable with 8 strands of “high purity” wire, giving it a thick and durable feel. FH5 is crystal clear; FH1 is a bit muddy in comparison. Here’s where the difference between FH5 and FH7 becomes most apparent. Both sound natural and easy on the ear with no listening fatigue at all. Listening to pop, for example, both models presented crispy percussion, giving plenty of snap to the track. There is a good tonal balanced across all frequencies and I think FiiO really nailed this time with FH5. FiiO F3: 25: U-shaped: Well-balanced U-shaped sound that's rather atypical of a chifi dynamic IEM. Both the FiiO FH5 and the Sennheiser IE 80 S fit securely and effortlessly. Overall the voices are clear and have the right amount of vibration; violins and guitars have the needed zing and pitch. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. For example, while both IEMs offer a similar feeling of height and depth, gradations along the vertical and horizontal axes sound more definite and exact. However there is another catch: because of their very revealing nature and high sensitivity they are pretty picky of the quality and the noise floor of the source. Now here’s the catch: the dynamic driver of FH5 has the same size as the FH1 of 10 mm that was notorious for really good bass response. Although I still think the 1More Quad is a great value IEM, I prefer the FiiO FH5 over it, since its bass is less boomy and sounds a little tighter, with more impact as well. The FH5 also uses a silver-plated copper wire, but it’s thinner and braided in a transparent thermoplastic sheath. Instead, I’ll leave you with a watch analogy. Rarely have I come across an IEM that fits my ears as well as the FH7. But again, the FH7 revealed the more subtle nuances in the attack and resolve of the instrument (like cymbals) compared to the relatively heavy handed character of the FH5 in this range. Comparison between FiiO M6, M7 & M9 High Resolution Lossless Music Players Model M6 M7 M9 CPU Exynos 7270 14nm Exynos 7270 14nm Exynos 7270 14nm CPU operating frequency 1GHz 1GHz 1GHz CPU No. Now, while you won’t be able to hear 5Hz, in theory, the extended frequency range should minimize distortion and increase clarity. I enjoy the FH5 more because of its bolder, more lively mid region as well. So, this review is for the kids who are familiar with at least one of these models, but want a comparison before they pull the trigger. Conclusions. FH5 is again a hybrid design that uses 3 balanced armatures to render mids and treble and a powerful dynamic driver to take care of the bass. FH5 sets apart from the other IEMs they done in the past, from the moment you unpack them you start to understand they are surely in the big boy category with this one. The FA7 has a more forward leaning bass, making the FH5 seem slightly vegan in comparison. It is unmistakably a dynamic driver with that slightly slower pace and natural levels of decay. So, listening to rock, for example, guitars tend to be more present on the FH7. They are by far the best IEM FiiO designed and can easily outmatch higher priced IEMs from other manufacturers. Of course, the level of detail, control and focus is better on FiiO Q5, but the sound quality was quite nice directly from the phone output as well. And listening to acoustic double bass plucks, the FH7 presented a cleaner and more natural timbre than the comparatively bass heavy and bloated FH5. Value for money compared to other IEMs in the same price range, The FiiO FH5 performs well, no matter from the aspects of design, structure, driver allocation or processing technology. Does this comparison refer to the FH7 when it is used with the filter that provides the most prominent bass? Fit. ... After extensive research I went with the Fiio FH5 headphones .....aaaaand almost immediately returned them. At 112dB/mW it was an easy task even for the underpowered M7, so volume was never past 50% almost all the time even on demanding classical pieces. FH5 have a better control over the drivers, bass notes on FH1 are looser and sound one-note sometimes, a thing that never happened on FH5. But the bass on the FH7 is a bit more tempered and more disciplined. Also four drivers VS two drivers is not fair as well. In total 12 pairs of ear tips are supplied with them, 3 sizes for 4 different categories of ear tips as follows: Opening this reveals the FH5 safely held inside a foam cut-out. Due to much faster sound on FH5, every vibration of the notes is decaying faster showing a better texture of every note. Compared to a quad-BA driver low-end equivalents such as the Noble Savanna, the FH5 bass performance is much more visceral, denser and definitely more powerful sounding. Well, well, I really was expecting this kind of sound quality from FH5 as they blown me away at the first listen. FH5 is crystal clear; FH1 is a bit muddy in comparison. There are way more worthy competitors in this price range, so I picked the ones most people asked about in comparison to FA7. For example they hiss a bit with FiiO’s own X5 MKIII, with Sony NW-WM1Z and they hiss more with a Burson Play and with some other desktop headphone amplifiers, be warned about that. You won’t lose that much soundstage by going with the more affordable FH5. However the bass response of FH1 almost stands shoulder to shoulder to the one of FH5. But if you’re also a fan of genres that involve acoustic instruments, the FH7 will offer a more realistic presentation. Much has already been written about both the FH5 and the FH7. Overall Impressions: The clean and intricate FH5 vs the rich and full-bodied FA7. I do find the bass not only deep but also very controlled due to its fast rises in dynamics. Overall, the FH7 doesn’t sound that much grander. I would end this with a car comparison considering that’s what inspired the design of the FH5’s, but I’m not a car person. Themain competitors for FA7 are FLC 8N, FiiO FH5, and HIFIMAN RE800 Silver. There is no denying it, FH5 is completely on another league, a much higher one. Graph Comparison Tool Back to Graph Database. save. And listening to rock, you’ll get a much warmer low-end from the FA7, while the FH5 presents a cleaner sound that is well separated from the higher frequencies. The Sony WM1A Walkman is the source used for sound evaluation. 93% Upvoted. The FA7 has a more forward leaning bass, making the FH5 seem slightly vegan in comparison. The bass turbine really wakes up the bass on higher quality electronica. So, if you’re just listening to modern genres like pop or hip-hop, the meaty, forward leaning bass on the FH5 is perfect. Bass also goes lower and has more layers of it. Unboxing experience was like a much higher priced IEM, I’m glad they are making time into thinking better ways to carefully pack a premium product. Considering the high sensitivity of FH5, I was surprised to see I didn’t get any hiss or noise with Oneplus 5, while with FiiO Q5 I did have a slight hiss noise. Sample 1. FH5 wins on build quality for sure but the mojito fires back with a more balanced signature and more detail. Shell. Vs Rose Mojito Another odd comparison as they really have nothing in common except price point. The level of comfort and sound isolation is... DESIGN. Lows. They have deep and layered bass, great mids with clear and vibrant voices, a good treble extension and a great separation of the notes portraying an out of head presentation due to well spread soundstage. FiiO FH5 Quad Driver Hybrid In-Ear Monitors Exotic-inspired Acoustics Design | Exotic-inspired S.TURBO technology Exotic-inspired independent sound tubes | Knowles Balanced Armature Drivers If you’re on a budget, and you mainly listen to modern genres like pop and hip-hop, the dynamic and punchy FH5 is a great buy. Design & Build Quality . Product Comparison: Fiio FH5 vs Fiio FH7. Finally, the FH7 comes with a three sets of different filters to tweak the sound signature. Awesome packaging with a good selection of accessories, Great tonal balance between all the frequencies, Clear and extended treble without being harsh, Awesome price for the sound performance we get, A balanced cable is no longer found in the package, DACs: Chord Hugo2, Mojo, Matrix X-Sabre Pro + S-SPDIF2, Burson Play, FiiO Q5, Headphone amps: Headamp Gilmore Lite MK2, Pico Power, Burson Play, IEMs: FiiO FH5, F9 PRO, FH1, SHure SE846, Audeze iSine 20, Sennheiser IE80, Headphones: Sennheiser HD660S, Momentum M2.0. There might be a slight roll off in the upper treble as it always sounds clear and detailed but never fatiguing which I find to be a bit weird, balanced armatures always sounded a bit fake to me due to sharp trebles but it is not the case with FH5. F9 PRO is better in the upper treble where is doesn’t roll off as fast, however for me it becomes a bit fatiguing after some time. FiiO Fa7 Review, with a short FH5 comparison (Demo tracks listed at the end) Review. The FH5 employs a 10mm (polymer nanocomposite) for the lows and 3 Knowles balanced armature drivers for the higher frequencies. FH5 have a much better tonal balance with better rendition of bass notes and midrange. Your email address will not be published. I burned in the FH5 for 10+ hours and listened to all types of lossless music. The cable that is only one in the package is much sturdier and much more resistant than the one found on the F9 series or on FH1. The FiiO FH5 is their new hybrid quad driver top of the line In-Ear Monitor. Advertising enquiries. Comparison of Fiio FH5 and Shure SE535 based on specifications, reviews and ratings. Disclaimer: The FiiO FH5 was sent to me by the company itself for this review. You won’t get this kind of creative control over the FH5, though the FH5 does also come with various types of eartips that accentuate certain aspects of the mix. hide. FH5 have a much higher impact and kick into eardrums compared to F9 series and that makes me quite happy of the overall sound signature. Overall the sound is clean, fast, has good extension, hits hard and lifts your mood, what more can you ask for? All rights reserved. However for an IEM design it is quite impressive as it is. Hi, If you already own a DAP that has a balanced output I highly recommend buying a separate cable such as LC-2.5B (2.5 mm balanced) or the LC-4.4B (4.4 mm balanced) to use it with the FH5, it makes a big positive difference compared to the SE connection. The shell on first appearance seems much bigger to house all those larger balanced armature drivers including a bigger dynamic one and the S.Turbo subwoofer and again resembles a custom IEM somehow. I would not be shocked if at this very moment they are already tinkering with a new flagship IEM, FiiO is on fire and I like that. “You can expect a fatter, slightly more present bass from the FH5, though both share a similar amount of subbiness.” Design – FiiO FH5 vs Sennheiser IE 80 S Comparison Review Look and Build. However, FiiO’s low-end tuning of the FH5 is more tasteful than overpowering. It has a tighter sound with better separation. 2018-07-10 The Naming Rules of FiiO Earphones 2018-07-03 FiiO Releases the 3.5-2.5 Cable BL35 and Micro-to-Micro Cable ML06 2018-06-26 Both IEM models use a hybrid driver design. As with later FiiO IEMs, FH5 is entirely made by the FiiO engineers that many times already showed us that they can create quality in-ear monitors such as F9, F9 PRO and FH1. FiiO FH5 quad driver hybrid in-ear monitors immerse yourself in An endless stream of music. Treble is also airy with lots of air between the notes, cymbals and drums never sound crowded, they always sound like two separate entities. And a few of my buddies have been wondering about the differences between FiiO’s latest flagship and the older FH5. Upper midrange in my opinion does not have this problem. The FH7 has 5 drivers; FiiO installed a 13.6mm (beryllium) dynamic driver for the lows, and 4 balanced armatures for the mids and highs. FH5 to this date are the most sensitive IEMs from FiiO, having an impedance of only 19Ω and a whopping sensitivity of 112 dB per 1 mW they can be powered by pretty much everything that has a headphone jack. But the FH5 is no chopped liver, and depending on your preferred music genres, it might be the more ideal choice. I’m a much bigger fan of the FA7 in this department. The FH5 employs a 10mm (polymer … Intro M7 also have a very honest and revealing sound so the match was perfect with FH5 and I can easily describe how FH5 are actually sounding. To make bass even deeper and more controlled besides the big 10 mm drivers they also developed what they are calling S.TURBO technology that mimics the work of a dedicated subwoofer with a turbine inspired design that really makes wonders with the bass. It not only provides a better seal, but is also a more comfortable wear. In this respect there is nothing to reproach about FH5. With better-layered bass and more presence into midrange and with a higher micro-details extraction the FH5 overall is a better earphone to me. Do you go for the U-shaped sound of the hybrid FH5 or the more even quad-balanced armature FA7? And listening to rock, you’ll get a much warmer low-end from the FA7, while the FH5 presents a cleaner sound that is well separated from the higher frequencies. And judging from photos alone, you can already tell that the FA7 is the more ergonomic design. FH5 is crystal clear; FH1 is a bit muddy in comparison. Due to its fast and airy nature, resolution is at a high level, FH5 do sound detailed with a good extraction of small micro-details. It is priced at $269.99. As a result, the FH5 provide a more dynamic feel with the lows and highs more accentuated. FH5 again raised the bar not only in FiiO’s portfolio but also in affordable high-end IEM market. Great packaging, lots of accessories inside, great design, great craftsmanship and most importantly a great sound, all those words represent the FiiO’s FH5. Overall Impressions: The clean and intricate FH5 vs the rich and full-bodied FA7. The FH5's low frequency sound tube adopts FiiO's patented S.TURBO acoustic structural design. I paired FH5 with FiiO’s latest DAP: the M7 that has a very low noise floor and a very black background without traces of noise. Required fields are marked *. X. 28. FH5 comes in a nice and quality packaging that actually surprised me a bit; especially the 11 pairs of ear-tips put in a foam sheet that shows exactly how each category of ear-tips will sound, so you no longer need to guess if this enhances the bass, the voices or the treble. My little lady fingers couldn’t take it. Did I catch your attention already? In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! FiiO never ceases to amaze me, few months ago I was testing their new flagship IEM: the F9, a few months later their new F9 PRO flagship and now they done it again with the FH5. FiiO FH5. Close. Anyway – back to the comparison. Acoustic guitar strums and, for example, sounded cleaner and more crystallized on the FH7. At 5Hz – 40kHz, the FH7 has a wider frequency range than that of the FH5, which is at 15Hz – 40kHz. Vocals sound meatier and sweater on FH5. Lower extremities are not cut this time, for example when listening The Prodigy – Invisible Sun there are few bass notes that makes butterflies in my stomach, a thing that never happened with F9 series. FiiO FH5 Best Over The Ear Headphones/Earphones Detachable Cable Design HiFi Quad Driver Hybrid ... (Argentina) about specifications, product quality and comparison with other brands, specially Sony at that time, so, this time I started reading more about Fiio current line-up reviews, experinces and more. Balanced ear tips (standard black silicone ones), Vocal ear tips (transparent with red sound tube), Memory foam ear tips (black foam ones) and the bass ear tips (black silicone with red sound tube). Your email address will not be published. The bass response reminded me a bit of F5 and FH1, but this time bass is much more controlled, it goes deep, presenting multiple layers of it and it decays in a natural way, not too fast and not too slow. The new shell, directly inherited from its siblings the FH5 and FH7, is made of an aluminum/magnesium alloy.It gives the IEM a premium feel and, in the hand, the FiiO FH3 definitely feels like … That being said, everyone’s ears are shaped differently, and the smaller shell size of the FH5 might be more suitable for folks with smaller ears. FH5 sounds also deeper, portraying a better depth and I can look easier into the mix. Competition? Tough comparison as more similar than not. share. The mids on the FH5 are more recessed than they are on the FH7. That was a tough question, even for me! By Comparison F9 series have a 9.2 mm dynamic driver that did well with bass but not great in some situations. Fiio includes 4 types of ear tips, all in 3 sizes; balanced, bass, vocals and memory foam. Buy 4-Driver FH5, the Best FiiO IEMs Ever, Win a Gift Worth $32.99! Comment document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "afe14eb92843ffc891a8ae0a9174a2d5" );document.getElementById("cb154b46ab").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Copyright © 2019 Headphone Dungeon. For now just watch and learn. Three bore design (one bore for bass, one for mids and one for treble) is also a novelty for FiiO that is being used in high-end IEMs around the globe. Its low frequencies... Middle Frequencies. Lower midrange sometimes sounds a bit suppressed by the bass notes, but that is the case only on bassier tracks. Rarely have I come across an IEM that fits my ears as well as the FH7. The upper bass notes seems a bit more pronounced than the sub-bass, its especially heard on groovy jazz tracks where double-bass is present. And when played a Whitney Houston track on the FH7, I heard lots of airiness and subtle modulations, while the FH5 presented a heavier, more colored and less natural sounding performance. Disclaimer: The FiiO FH5 sent to us for the purposes of this review is a sample and does not have to be returned. But if you’re looking for a more balanced and versatile IEM that works beautifully across all genres, the more precise and full-bodied FH7 should be your pick. Great sound should not cost a fortune and I thank FiiO for that, this is how it should be done. Advertiser Disclosure. 1More Stylish True Wireless Earbuds Review, Headphone Dungeon Holiday Gift Guide 2020. Posted by. Most of the time they sound full but on rare occasions few voices do sound like they are sitting further away from the listener, bass comes forward more often. Fiio is a hugely prominent name in the audio industry, initially due to their range of affordable yet well-rounded source devices, soon their DAPs and lately, their IEMs. B-C: DD: E1 demo unit: 184: 73: 111: 25: C ★ FiiO F5: 65: V-shaped: Typical chifi V-shaped sound, nothing much to report on. Sample 2. Starting with the package, IT04 has a better carrying case, made out of thick metal. I find the depth to be better than the soundstage. Lows. beyerdynamic Soul BYRD review (+ mini Fiio FH5 comparison/review) Impressions. After the Picture Sunday post, we finally take a detailed look at the FiiO FH5, the company’s most serious In Ear Monitor to date. Soundstage is good but not great, sincerely it is quite hard to make an in-ear monitor that sounds wide and spread with drivers that are sitting millimeters away from your eardrums. And of course, there are the obvious differences in the level of detail and separation offered by these two models, with the much pricier FH7 outstaging the FH5 in terms of overall skill. In the package can be also found a big transparent waterproof case and a fabric pouch that I use most of the time when I travel because it’s smaller and easier to carry around. So my friends, lets get to the most interesting part of the review. I can easily look deeper into the mix with FH5 however the width and height of the stage is limited and cannot compete with an open-back design for example. FiiO FH5 vs iBasso IT04 - We had second thoughts about starting with this comparison, but at the end of the day, it is necessary to start with something that will keep our readers intrigued. There is no denying it, FH5 is completely on another league, a much higher one. So, you’ll get a slightly more colorful feel from the FH7. Both have a sub-bass emphasis although FiiO is a bit better extended and more authoritative. In comparison, the FH7 sounds more full-bodied and all-encompassing on rock and pop-rock tracks, presenting clearer and more forward mids and low mids. The shell is machined entirely with CNC technology from blocks of aluminum giving them a premium feel to the touch and to the eyes. Comparison of Fiio FA7 and Fiio FH5 based on specifications, reviews and ratings. Sound – FiiO FH5 vs Shure SE425 Comparison Review Lows Frequencies. But the major difference here is the level of precision with respect to imaging. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. FH5 is more natural sounding, less harsh; you could call it a meatier sound. report. With that in mind, let’s take a look at which IEM will suit your ears and listening style in this FiiO FH5 vs FiiO FH7 Comparison Review. With the FH7 selling for almost double the price of the FH5, there will be little surprise about which IEM performs better. Inside is a large book style case, simply embossed with the FiiO name/logo. Another major difference lies in the cables. I was hoping that the FiiO FH5, being a hybrid, could bring some HD800-like soundstage to the IEM. The new FiiO FH7 is making quite a splash in the audiophile community. One small factor to note is that the MMCX connectors are more stiff on the FH5 than they are on the FH7, making them quite a bit harder to detach. In contrast, the FH5 conveys more “distant” sounding guitars and generally more forward leaning vocals. And listening to cellos, the FH7 presented a far more textured sound to the less nuanced and smoothed over FH5. Treble sounds crispy and can bite sometimes, but it’s not bright at all. With its specially designed turbine-inspired design that makes clever use the physics of sound waves, you get meaty, deep bass that is more than capable of letting you feel the music. The comfort is better on FA7. The midrange of the FiiO FH5 is full with a little … 4 comments. Great packaging, lots of accessories inside, great design, great craftsmanship and most importantly a great sound, all those words represent the FiiO’s FH5. The FiiO FH5 arrived in quite a large (~ 155mm x 209mm x 73mm) retail box with very simple black over-sleeve (just the words FiiO, FH5, Hi-Res Audio logo, and a graphic image of the FH5 on the sleeve). You can expect a fatter, slightly more present bass from the FH5, though both share a similar amount of subbiness. Both IEM models use a hybrid driver design. Aesthetically, I think FiiO nailed it with the FH3. Great packaging, lots of accessories inside, great design, great craftsmanship and most importantly a great sound, all those words represent the FiiO’s FH5. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Ok, I know this is not a fair comparison as FH1 is much cheaper. FiiO Fa7 Review, with a short FH5 comparison (Demo tracks listed at … Transition from bass to midrange is done in a natural way so the flow keeps going without stuttering or dips. You’ll hear a similar extension in this range. This thread is archived. 1 month ago. There is no denying it, FH5 is completely on another league, a much higher one. Daft Punk , Infected Mushroom and The Prodigy was a real treat to listen to. Buy FiiO FD1 Single Dynamic IEMs at a very low price from this official store Check this link >>> Comparison between FiiO FA9, FH7, FA7, FH5, FA1, F9 Pro, F9, FD1 Customer Reviews And I had a nagging need to to push the FH5 deeper into my ears, while the FA7 required no adjustment. I do prefer the Memory foam ones as they isolate better and sound most neutral to me with just a slight boost in the lows. Conclusion. FiiO FH5 vs FiiO FH7 Comparison Review FIT. So, again, if you’re mostly listening to genres like folk, rock, classical or anything with heavy arrangements, the FH7 would be my pick. Inside are the earphones seated within a foam cutout with the accessories underneath. Thank you to FiiO for giving us this opportunity. I didn’t get nearly as much sound isolation from the FH5. Sort by. It’s more rigid; it’s thicker and uses high-purity mono-crystalline silver-plated copper (SPC) wire for higher quality signal transfer that minimizes distortion and signal transmission loss for best sound quality possible. The price of the FH5 is 260$ at this time. The overall sound signature is quite similar, but FH5 has a much better treble response and a more textured midrange.
Whole Wheat Sourdough Pita Recipe, Yerba Mate Can, Numerology Number 3 Personality, Virtual Reality Books Fiction, Gd Handshake Gif, Ssis Certification 2019, Apartments For Sale In Sioux Falls, Sd, Shri Sangeetas Trichy, Sbs Drama 2018,